Welcome on the ECCE-6 CDROM.

Conference logo

European Congress of Chemical Engineering - 6
Copenhagen 16-21 September 2007

Abstract 595 - Designing with CAPE-Open

Designing with CAPE-Open

Systematic methods and tools for managing the complexity

Software Architecture, Standards & Interfaces (T4-7)

PhD Martin Breil
University of Denmark
IVCSEP, Dpt of Chemical Engineering
DTU - Building 229
Søltofts Plads
DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby
Denmark

PhD Jostein Gabrielsen
Technical University of Denmark
IVC-SEP, Dpt of Chemical Engineering
DTU - Building 229
Søltofts Plads
DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby
Denmark

Asc. Prof Nicolas von Solms
Technical University of Denmark
IVC-SEP, Dpt. of Chemical Engineering
Technical University of Denmark
Building 229
2800 Kgs. Lyngby
Denmark

Prof Georgios Kontogeorgis
Technical University of Denmark
IVC-SEP, Department of Chemical Engineering
Building 229
DK-2800
Lyngby
Denmark

Prof Erling Stenby
Technical University of Denmark
IVC-SEP, Department of Chemical Engineering
Building 229
DK-2800
Lyngby
Denmark

Keywords: CAPE-Open, thermodynamics, unit operation, CO2 absorption

The CAPE-Open standard offers the developers of new thermodynamic models and new unit operations the possibility of providing these products as plug-ins to process simulators. The advantage is the elimination of the complex and lengthy step of computational implementation.
The steady increase in the number of CAPE-Open compliant thermodynamic modules tells us that the problem of making codes CAPE-Open compliant (while difficult) has been solved. Therefore the focus for thermodynamicists must be on good thermodynamic models. Ten years of experience of using the Cubic-Plus-Association (CPA) equation of state [1-2] have demonstrated that it is a very successful model for handling multi-component, multiphase equilibrium in systems containing hydrogen-bonding substances.
Besides the need for good thermodynamic models, there is also a need for the ability of making tailor-made unit operations. To this end, the CAPE-Open standard is an obvious choice and a good example is the CO2 capture using an alkanolamine solution [3]. This unit operation encapsulates the essential properties of most unit operations: thermodynamics, chemical reactions and mass transfer. The fundamentals of the unit operation have been validated using data obtained from a fully computerized pilot plant.
Normally, the performance of a unit operation will depend on the choice of the thermodynamic model. Often unit operations, which are based on the CAPE-Open technology, do not offer the user the privilege of choosing among the many models of the process simulator. However, it does not need to be so. It is possible to develop CAPE-Open unit operations that handle any of the thermodynamic models available in the process simulator.

References
[1] G.M. Kontogeorgis, M.L. Michelsen, G.K. Folas, S.O. Derawi, N. von Solms and E.H. Stenby, “Ten years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) equation of state. Part I. Pure compounds and Self-associating systems”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4855.
[2] G.M. Kontogeorgis, M.L. Michelsen, G.K. Folas, S.O. Derawi, N. von Solms and E.H. Stenby, “Ten years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) equation of state. Part II. Cross-associating and multicomponent systems”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4869.
[3] J. Gabrielsen, M.L. Michelsen, E.H. Stenby, and G.M. Kontogeorgis, “Modeling of CO2 Absorber Using an AMP Solution”, AIChE J. 2006, 52, 3443.

Presented Monday 17, 16:40 to 17:00, in session Software Architecture, Standards & Interfaces (T4-7).

Conference logo