This model of early relaxation was later confirmed by a
combined experimental and theoretical analysis (
173), although the
interaction with the blood column was not specified, and the
load dependency of early diastolic tissue velocity was taken
to mean that the load (filling pressure) was part of the
mechanism for ventricular elongation (enlargement), although
this is doubtful, considering that the pressure in the
ventricle actually drops during early diastole as discussed
below.
Regional systolic
function
The regional systolic function is traditionally shown as
wall motion score:
- Normal
- hypokinetic
- Akinetic
- Dyskinetic
Wall motion score index (WMSI), being the average of
wall motion score of all evaluable segments becomes a
measure of
global
function, and has been shown to correlate with EF
in infarcted ventricles (
40).
However,
the index is useless unless there is regional differences.
Any dilated cardiomyopathy will show hypokinesia in all
segments, giving a WMSI of 2, regardless of EF. Thus, wall
motion score is useful only in regional dysfunction.
Segmental division
of the left ventricle. The segments are related to
different vascular territories, as shown by the
colours. After Lang et al (146). However,
in the figure given in that paper, the apicolateral
segment is given as Cx or LAD, while the apical
inferolateral is not, despite the model is only giving
four segements in the apex. Thus, there is a
slight inconsistency.
This segmental model gives a longitudinal resolution of the
model of about 3 cm, and a circumferential of 60°, which
may be considered low. However, in relation to vascular
territories, it seems sufficient, and deformation rate
measurements with higher resolutions (which are possible
with both speckle tracking and tissue Doppler) have not so
far demonstrated added clinical value.
16, 17 or 18 segments?
It has been an issue of discussion how many segments the
left ventricle should be divided into. As there are
different recommendation, and the reasons for the
recommendations are partly historical, they are reviewed.
The original ASE recommendation was six segments in the base
and midwall, but only four in the apex (
239). The reason for this
was that the three standard planes were visualised as the
apical four- and two-chamber planes, but the parasternal
long axis. AS apical segments were not seen in most
parasternal windows, there was only four segments, and the
lateral and inferolateral and likewise the septal and
anteroseptal segments were considered the same.
In an attempt to harmonise nuclear and echo imaging
terminology (
240), an
apical "cap" segment was added, giving a total of 17. This,
however is due to the thickness that is vuisualised in
nuclear myocardial images, while the wall in the apex in
reality is very thin.
In the present ASE/EAE consensus recommendation (
146), this is commented
on, and
there is no direct recommendation on using 17
segments. On the contrary, it
says explicitly: "The apical cap can only be appreciated on
some contrast studies. A 16 segment model can be used,
without the apical cap, as described in an ASE 1989
document."
At present, using three standard apical planes, the approach
will result in 18 segments. For segmental analysis, this
doesn't matter, and we have used that approach in the HUNT
study (
153), giving
normal values for each wall and level. However,
for global function
calculated as an average of segmental values, 18 segments
is incorrect. the amount of myocardium in the
apeical level is less, and should be weighted less, as the
16 segment model will do automatically. For this we have
reduced the number of segments by averaging the the lateral
and inferolateral segmental values and likewise the septal
and anteroseptal segmental values before calculating the
global average of 16 (
153,
223).
It is regional systolic dysfunction the deformation imaging
has it's main use, as it makes it possible to differentiate
between passive motion due to
tethering
and active contraction. Longitudinal strain can give the
wall motion score by parametric imaging
. It has been shown to give about the same infrmatin as wall
thickening by B-mode (
6,
7).
Do annular measures give
regional information?
As strain and strain rate are noisy methods, it is an
attractive thought thay annular measures (annular systolic
displacement or velocity) will give some regional
information, in that points on the mitral ring close to a
hypo- or akinetic area will show reduced motion, while
remote points will not.It might be conceivable that tilting
of the mitral ring in response to different actions of the
different walls in regional dysfunction might lead to
tilting of the ring.
Again,
this seemed to be something "everybody knew", because
it seemed so obvious. Indeed that hypothesis has been
maintained for a long time, and still is, by some.
This hypothesis is illustrated below:
Hypothesis
However, this is
definitely not the case, as we showed already in
2003 (
40).
In a study of 19 infarct patients versus 19 control
subjects, we found that while global function was reduced in
patients, the
variability between
the difference between annular points was not:
|
Mean
|
|
EF (%) |
WMSI
|
MAE(mm)
|
S' (cm/s pwTDI) |
S'
(cm/s cTDI) |
Segmental SRs (s-1)
|
| Patients: |
41
|
1.6
|
1.2
|
7.7
|
4.8
|
1.0
|
| Controls: |
55*
|
1*
|
1.6*
|
9.9*
|
7.6*
|
1.4*
|
|
|
Mean intra subject variation (max - min)
|
| Patients: |
|
|
0.41
|
2.8
|
2.5
|
1.6
|
| Controls: |
|
|
0.41
|
3.4
|
2.8
|
1.0*
|
Thus,
no ring measures
showed increased variability in infarct patients who had
regional dysfunction. Only the
segmental measure of strain rate did show
that, despite having the highest variability. Moreover, in
the patients; there were no differences between the
magnitude of ring measures close to the infarct, compared to
the measures remote from the infarct:
|
MAE(mm) |
S' (cm/s pwTDI) |
S'
(cm/s cTDI) |
Segmental SRs (s-1) |
Mean SRs (s-1)
per wall
|
Close:
|
1.2
|
7.7
|
4.9
|
0.8
|
1.0
|
Remote:
|
1.2
|
7.2
|
5.1
|
1.1*
|
1.1
|
The mitral ring motion were reduced
in infarct patients compared to controls, and more reduced
in anterior than in inferior infarcts due to the difference
in infarct size.Thus, it can not be inferred that the point
on the ring close to the infarct can identify the affected
wall.Oonly the
segmental
measure did show difference between close and remote points,
while the
ring measures
did not. And finally, averaging all three segments
in a wall, resulting in a wall measure equivalent to the
ring measures, made this difference disappear. This means
that ring measures all are
global measures, local reduction of
contractility will affect segmental shortening, but not
local ring motion. The global systolic motion of the ring is
a measure of the infarct size (
32),
being reduced in proportion to the total amount of
longitudinal fibre loss (
210).
Segmental
reduced function will not cause the ring to lag in part of
the circumference, however, the total ring motion will be
reduced as a function of the reduced total shortening force.
This may explain why the global strain is just as useful as
regional strain in assessing the infarct size (
205).
There are fundamental anatomical and physiological reasons
for this.
Firstly: The AV plane is not only the mitral ring. The
mitral ring is stiff, each segment
does not move independently.Not only are
the segments around the mitral ring closely bound together,
thus excluding the possibility of each segment moving
independently, but the mitral ring itself is part of the
whole AV plane, consisting of the connected rings of the
pulmonary artery, the aorta, the mitral and the
tricuspid valves. There is no isolated mitral ring, the ring
is simply part of the much bigger fibrous AV plane, and thus
even the possibility of the ring tilting as each wall
functions differently, is severely restricted. :

|

|
| The AV plane. It
consists of a fibrous plane connecting the rings of the
pulmonary artery (PA), the aorta (Ao), the
Mitral (MV) and the tricuspid (TV) valves, and
surrounded by the muscular base of the heart.
The sections of the mitral ring cannot be seen
as indepndently moving structures. Thus,
segments will interact within this framework. |
And both ventricles
move the AV plane. (It might seem to be slightly
flexible, as the motion of the tricuspid corner
(tapse) is higher than the mitral motion, but
still the palne will move as a whole, even if
there is some deformation. The velocities of the
lateral left wall are higher than the septum,
but this is due to the longer wall, as discussed
above.
The overall systolic motion
is not so different.
|
Secondly, the segments interact within the framework of the
AV-plane. From the understanding that the AV pklane is a
rigid frame, the segment-segment interaction is necessary to
understand the effects of regional function measured by
deformation imaging.
Segment interaction
The
load dependency of
deformation parameters, as well as the understanding of
load as partly the global load (determined by the radius
of curvature and the intracavitary pressure), and the
regional load, being dependent on the force from
neighbouring segements, is the basis for the differences
in systolic deformation. Thus the main point is that
deformation parameters
are load dependent.
But this means that if the contractility in one segment is
reduced, the part of the load of neighbour segments that
is caused by the contraction from that segment, is
reduced. This lead to increased deformation of
neighbouring segments, due to reduced load -
without any increase in
contractility, and, concomitantly, the affected
segment will show reduced deformation. This again, is due
to the point that the global deformation happens within a
framework of a virtual "
eggshell",
and
the AV plane.
The global loss of contractility by a regional process (as
ischemia or infarction) will reduce the global
deformation, and within the ventricle the
regional
deformation will reflect the inequalities of force
development (contractility). Thus, regional loss of
contractility may be
inferred from the
reduced regional deformation.

|
| Diagram of
longitudinal segment interaction. the
longitudinal shortening of one segment results
in shortening of the segment itself (orange
arrows), but also in motion (red arrows) of
the segments basally to it. (In this
illustration, the red arrows show the motion
of the middle of the segment, meaning that it
also included the effect of the shortening of
the apical half of the segment itself.)and the
motion of each segment is equal to the
summation of the shortening of the segments apically.
However, the primary effect is force
generation. And this means that contraction in
one segment results in a force applied to the
neighboring segments. This force has different
effects, as the apex is considered anchored
(by the recoil
force), while the midwall segment has
force applied from both sides, and the basal
segment is freely movable. The main
point is that the force from neighboring
segments may be considered part of the load of
each segment, and that motion is secondary to
deformation, but deformation is secondary to
force and load. |
(This load dependency is also the basis for the
post systolic shortening. )
Both acute ischemia (
46,
99), as well as loss of
longitudinal fibres in myocardial infarction (
210) will lead to loss of
contractile force in the longitudinal direction. This is
equivalent to a local increase in the load/contractility
relation. This, however, may give different deformation
patterns, depending of the amount and location of the
contractility loss. Again, it is to be emphasized that the
deformation does
not measure
contractility directly, nor is deformation dependent
on muscle action alone.
 |

|
| Deformation patterns
in apical loss of contractility. A: normal
pattern as in the diagram above.
B: partial loss of contractility, as shown by
the shorter black arrow pulling on the midwall
segment. In this case several things may happen:
If the residual contractility is just about to
balance the force from the two other segments,
no deformation occurs, thus the segment will be
akinetic, but not due to a total loss of force.
Thus, akinesia does not necessarily mean total
loss of function. If the contractility is a
little better, there will be shortening, i. e
hypokinesia. If the contractility is a little
too small, there will be stretching, i.e.
dyskinesia as in C. In the case of akinesia
shown here, there will be a little motion of the
middle of the midwall segment, due to the
shortening of the apical part, but not much, and
the basal segment will have substantially
reduced motion as well, despite both segments
having normal shortening. C: Total loss of
contractility. (Of course, in this case normal
function of the midwall is improbable, this is
just an illustration of the mechanics. In
this case, as the apex is anchored, there will
be stretching of the apical segment. The
midwall segment may then have no motion, as the
stretching of the apex and the shortening of the
basal segment may cancel out, as depicted here.
Or there may be net motion in the apical
direction, as the stretching may require more
force than moving the (more freely moving) basal
segment. Also, especially in infarction,
the picture may be complicated by fibrosis.
Heavy fibrosis in scarring may render the
segment totally un-stretchable, thus mimicking
situation B. |
Apical infarct. In
LAD infarcts, the whole of the apex is usually
affected, the infarct sits as a "cap" over the
apex, although the extension towards the base
may vary in the various walls. Thus, the
reasoning in the illustration to the left holds
for the whole ventricle.
|
In apical infarcts, some of the mechanics is thus determined
by the fact that the apex is anchored (by the recoil force)
and does not move. In basal inferior or inferolateral
infarcts, the infarcted segments are situated close to the
more freely moving ring. Thus, even with loss of
contractility, there will be less load, so the base can
shorten, and even with total loss of contractility, the
segment will move. so the tendency to stretching is less,
and even in functionless infarcts there may be no or nearly
no stretching. However, this is not the only point. In
LAD infarcts, the infarcted segments are situated in the
apex, as shown above left, meaning that all walls are
affected, although the extension towards the base may vary,
so the wall are not affected to the same degree. In Infarcts
of the RCA or distal Cx, as well as isolated obtuse or
diagonal infarcts, the infarct does not extend around the
whole circumference, and the effect is more regional as
shown below.

|

|
Inferior infarct.
A: Normal function. (The arrows indicating
normal shortening are smaller, to give room
for the hyperkinesia in the infarct situation
in B.) B: Total loss of force in the basal
segment. Even with total loss of force, the
segment can be pulled along, due to the tethering effect,
and
the fact that the mitral ring, as opposed to
the apex, is movable. A perfect example of
this can be seen here. Thus the
probability of any great degree of stretching
is less probable. A small amount of
stretching my be present, depending on the
interaction with the other segments pulling on
the mitral ring. There is thus no force
from the basal segment acting on the rest of
the wall, and thus the load on the two other
segments are reduced, leading to increased
shortening, which may be interpreted as
"compensatory hyperkinesia". However,
this follows as a function of reduced
load, not hyper function. AS
the mitral ring moves around the whole of the
circumference, the shortening normally
distributed to three segments, in the
infarcted wall is only distributed to two.
|
Inferior infarct.
There is slight stretching, but the main point
is the fact that the infarct only affects the
base and midwall of the inferior wall, and the
base of the septum. Thus only the basal part
of 1/3 of the circumference is affected.
|
Thus, it may seem that in
apical infarcts, there is more resistance to the normal
segments, as the infarcted segments are stretched, and
thus, there is a slightly higher load, while the basal
infarcts, sitting at a moving ring, will offer less
resistance to the normal segments, allowing them to
shorten more.
In studies of the course of infarcts (
92,
188), it has been seen
that as there is initial hypo- to akinesia in infarcted
segments, there is corresponding hyperkinesia in
neighbouring non infartcted segments. As contractility
in infarct segments improve due to recovery of the
stunning part of the injury, the resiproke hyperkiesia
will regress as illustrated below.

|

|
| Inferior infarct
at day 1, showing akinesia in the basal
segment (yellow curve) and hyperkinesia in
the apex (blue curve). The hyperkiesia can
be explained by the load reduction due to
the lack of force from the infarcted
segment. (Image courtesy
of Charlotte Björk Ingul). |
The same patient
at day 7. Function in the basal segment
(yellow curve) can be seen to be nearly
normalised, and the shortening of the apical
segment (blue curve) is correspondingly
reduced. (Image courtesy of Charlotte
Björk Ingul).
|
The hypothesis of the regional effects on the mitral
ring is thus disproved by
anatomy,
by the
load
dependency of regional deformation and by studies
(
40,
92,
188).
What
"everybody knew" was wrong. There is no regional
reduction of mitral motion in regional
dysfunction.
Only global
reduction of mitral motion, and segmental
hypokiesia with resiprocal hyperkinesia.
Motion is global
function, only deformation can be regional.
As shown above, motion
parameters will thus always reflect global function,
only deformation parameters can show regional
function. This can be seen both in systolic
and
diastolic
function. The myocardium moves within the stiff
framework of the annular plane and the "eggshell", but
within this, there are differences in deformation, both
in amount and timing, which will lead to segments
deforming differentially.
Thus, as deformation is a result of tension, or rather
tension versus load, strain does not measure function
directly. But the effect of the force from neighbouring
segments is part of load. Taking
regional function into the concept
of load, deformation imaging can be used to
infer
force, or at least inequalities in force development, as
shown
below.
This means that regional deformation is closer to
contractility than
global
measures, which are dependent on absolute load.
And that is the main point in regional diagnosis.
In relaxation, this means that while protodiastolic
elongation is mid ventricular, it will result in
elongation also in the base, early relaxation has
different timing of deformation in different levels, but
still results in an over all motion of elongation.
Segements may contract differentially, but this is not
reflected in regional differences of motion. Finally,
global strain is simply global ring motion normalised
for LV size.
Regional
circumferential strain
The regional circumferential strain may be affected in
different ways, depending on the degree of
transmurality, as sub endocardial infarcts to little
degree affects the midwall circumferential fibres, with
little or no effect on circumferential force. Transmural
infarcts affects those, leading to regional loss of
circumferential force. However, as circumferential
strain is defined as midwall circumferential shortening,
even sub endocardial infarcts will result in loss of
circumferential strain due to loss of substance. As
subendocardial infarcts leads to loss of subendocardial
fibres, there will be a reduced wall thickness and also
less wall thickening in the infarcted area in absolute
terms. However, thickening in relative terms (percent of
end diastolic wall thickness. i.e. strain) may be less
affected (i.e. less absolute thickening in a thinner
wall may give the same strain).
However, as the wall is thinner, the midwall
circumference is greater, but shortens less (in absolute
terms) due to reduced wall thickening. Thus, there will
be
less
circumferential shortening of a
longer
circumference, i.e. the circumferential strain will be
reduced, even without affection of circumferential
fibres as shown below. Howeever, this will not lead to
changed function by segment interaction, as the
circumferential force is not affected.
.
Diagram of a
sub endocardial infarct, not affecting
circumferential fibres. The infarcted area is
depicted as an area with loss of endocardial
longitudinal fibres. As shown this leads to a
thinner wall in the infarcted area, and the
midwall line is shifted outwards. As the wall
thickens in systole, the thickening is less in the
infarcted area, and this effect is even greater
than the loss of fibres, as the effect of the
fibre rearrangement would have been most
pronounced in the endocardial layer due to the
geometry. However, the effect on transmural strain
is unpredictable, as there is less thickening of a
thinner wall, the transmural strain, being
relative, may be preserved. The midwall
circumference, however, is increased, while the
circumferential shortening (absolute) is decreased
due to less thickening as shown above.
This means less shortening of a longer
circumference. Thus, even without loss of
circumferential fibres, there has to be reduced
circumferential strain in the infarcted area.
However, analysing program using an ROI, will give
the shortening of the midwall line of the ROI as
circumferential shortening. Thus, the ROI width,
not the wall thickness is determining factor, and
this effect may be lost, if the ROI is not very
well fitted to the endocardium. This is indicated
with the dotted lines representing an assumed
equal width ROI around the circumference.
The effect on the width of the ROI in 2D strain is
illustrated below.
In infarcts affecting the circumferential fibres; i.e.
infarcts with a higher degree of transmurality, the
geometry may be somewhat different. In this case the
circumferential force is reduced or absent in the
infarct, resulting an an imbalance of forces equivalent
to what is seen in the longitudinal direction. This
means that there may be a systolic stretching of the
infarcted wall in the circumferential direction, and
also an increased circumferential shortening of the
intact part of the wall. This is shown below.
Exaggerated
diagram of an infarct affecting circumferential
fibres. In this case, the force (black arrows)
from the circumferential fibres will pull and extend
the affected area in systole (boundary marked by
green arrows), the infarct being without balancing
forces. The intraventricular pressure will
still serve to keep the wall distended (blue arrow),
preventing the infarcted area to be pulled straight
across the gap. Thus, the wall structures in the
infarct may even diverge from each other, which is
hypothetically detectable in speckle tracking.
Transmural strain may also be more affected, as
there will be no wall thickening due to crowding and
inward motion of longitudinal fibres (even if there
are some left).
Some authors have found a higher sensitivity
for transmurality by circumferential strain (221).
However,
this may also be a function of reduced sensitivity
for subendocardial infarcts, due to the ROI issue as
discussed above. The effect of ROI width is
illustrated below.
Post systolic shortening
Post systolic shortening (PSS) means that the segment
continues shortening after the aortic valve closure, often
after a short relaxation giving one or two peaks a systolic
and a post systolic, or a single peak after AVC as shown in
the figure below, left. The definition of shortening as post
systolic is dependent on the location of AVC, which can be
done by TDI as described
above.
This holds even in the presence of iskemia (with PSS) and in
high HR
(170).
A small amount of post systolic shortening may be present in
up to 1/3 of normal segments (
47),
but not more than ca 3%. Pathological strain is concomitant
with reduced
systolic
strain, and higher post systolic strain (in magnitude), as
well as later peak PSS. Post systolic shortening and post
systolic thickening are to some degree equivalent, due to
the incompressibility as discussed
above.
It is evident that in a segment being stretched in systole,
if there is any elasticity at all, the segment will recoil
in diastole, i.e. as a function of the elastic force stored
in the segment. (also, if the segment had not returned to
the original shape, the whole heart would have been turned
inside out in the time of a few minutes. Thus, stretch
recoil is a mechanism for post systolic shortening. However,
PSS can be seen in segment that have systolic shortening as
well, as shown
below.
In ischemia, post systolic shortening develops
before
there is systolic stretching (
46,
100
), i.e. while there still is systolic shortening as shown in
the stress example
below.
Thus, PSS can be present where there is systolic shortening
as well, and here the mechanism has to be different from the
recoil. It has been proposed that storing of elastic forces
due to the interaction with normal segments during systole
maybe a mechanism, but it is difficult to see how this can
be the case, as elasticity is a function of stretch. In
ischemia, the development of force is reduced, due to a
lower energy state. Both the rate of shortening as well as
the total shortening (i.e. strain rate and strain) is
reduced. Thus the increased relative load in ischemic /
infarcted segments is important, in that it delays the force
development, and the ischemic segments will shorten less due
to the decrease in contractility relative to the regional
load.
But in the energy depletion (as in acute ischemia), the
availability of ATP for the removal of calcium from the
cytoplasm is also reduced, thus leading to a continuation of
tension. Thus, ischemic segments maintians tesion longer
than the other segments of the ventricle. This means that
when the normal segments relax, the ischemic segments
maintain the tension, and thus will shorten due to the
decrease in regional load form the normal segments.
When healthy myocardium relaxes, the delayed relaxation of
the pathologic segments will cause them to shorten, as a
function of the reduced force in normal segments. Thus, the
post systolic shortening is a function of the interaction
between segments. In this phase, there is pressure decay as
well, decreasing global load, further reducing the load on
the affected segments. Thus, post systolic shortening is
mainly the reduced, but prolonged contraction of a segment
due to ischemia and / or relative load increase in the early
diastolic interaction with normally relaxing segments.
Diagram of post
systolic shortening in an apical segment. In systole,
there is reduced contractility (force) in the apical
segment, causing reduced shortening compared to the
other segments. In early diastole, there is no force
from the normal segments, as they now are elongating
during relaxation. (Elongating being the result of
elastic recoil from the systolic compression as
discussed above).
The
prolonged contraction (force development) in the
affected segment, is allowed to continue shortening as
it is not counteracted, causing further shortening
during early diastole.
That segment interaction is a prerequisite for PSS, can be
seen in the example
below,
where there is total ischemia, and hence, no normal segments
and (almost) no PSS in the ischemic segments.
In ischemia, the cytoplasmic calcium transient is also
reduced, leading to more prolongation of the contraction,
thus there may be more PSS in ischemia than in old infarcts
where the mechanism is mainly relative load. This seems to
be the case as the presence of PSS decreases in the three
months following the infarcts (
92).
The post systolic shortening was about the same in border
zone segments and infarct segments, despite infarct segments
having lower absolute value of peak systolic strain rate.
The PSS diappeared in the border zone segments in a week.
As seen by the colour M-mode
below,
the presence of post systolic shortening in a segment, leads
to a delay in the onset of segmental lengthening compared to
the normal segments, so the finding is equivalent to the
delayed compression/expansion crossover described by some
authors (
186).
Looking at
Strain
rate, it is evident that any systolic stretch
with early diastolic recoil will show up as post systolic
shortening. However, with strain, it is useful to separate
between systolic shortening followed by post systolic
shortening. This is better shown in the curves with strain,
but also in the colour M-mode of strain rate, which in
addition gives the extent of PSS.
 |
 |
Normal strain rate
curves. Note that there is a little shortening
of the lateral wall (cyan curve) after AVC
(green vertical line). This is normal, and
related to the shape change in IVR.
|
Reduced systolic
shortening and presence of post systolic
shortening in the apical segment (cyan curve),
with normal systolic shortening and no post
systolic shortening in the basal segment (yellow
curve).
|
Two different
instances of post systolic shortening. Apicolaterally,
there is stretching and then recoil after AVC (cyan
curve). There is little indication of active
contraction at all (except possibly a little
overshoot, but that may be elastic). However, the
stretchability and recoil indicates that the tissue
has not lost it's elasticity. Apicoseptally there is
systolic shortening and then further post systolic
shortening (yellow curve), which thus has to be
active. It also shows the mechanism for PSS to be
different than recoil. In fact, these curve is
very similar to the curves in the original work of
Tennant and Wiggers from 1935 (46).
The presence of post systolic shortening in the earliest
phase of acute ischemia, was demonstrated already by Tennant
and Wiggers in their experimental work in 1935 (
46),
although
in the paper they chose not to discuss the phenomenon,
concentrating on the initial stretching and decrease in
amplitude of shortening, and the full dyskinetic pattern
showing up after a minute or so. It is rumored that they
considered this an artifact, but the phenomenon is clearly
visible in the published traces. Post systolic thickening in
ischemia was shown in a case by Jamal et al in 1999 (
185), and demonstrated
during angioplasty by Kukulski et al (
100). Decreasing systolic
and increasing post systolic shortening with increasing
ischemia is demonstrated below. (In fact, there is a
striking similarity with the traces by Tennant and Wiggers
in their original paper. It was shown to be present in both
is chemic and scarred myocardium (
47),
in
about 75 to 80% of segments.
Development of
apical ischemia during stress echo.; showing normal
contraction at baseline, increased during low dose (10
µg/kg/min, may be a biphasic contraction at 20 µg/kg/min, not very
evident in this animation, but may be better
visualised by stopping and scrolling the loop in the
clinical situation.

|

|

|
Colour SRI M-modes
from septum of the same examination, showing
clearly at 20 µg/kg/min the
development of a prolonged shortening period in
the apex, but still systolic shortening as
well. During peak stress, there is virtually no
systolic shortening, only post systolic.
|
Strain curves at 20 µg/kg/min (top)
and peak stress (bottom),
showing systolic hypokinesia at low dose
with PSS and akinesia in septum / dyskinesia
laterally with PSS. Thus, PPSS are seen also
with hypokineqsia, and is not only a recoil
after stretch.
|
Post systolic shortening has been proposed to an additional
diagnostic criterion for ischemia in stress echo (
113), but other studies
has not shown additional diagnostic value of this (
128). Two examples of
systolic dyskinesia with post systolic shortening in
myiocardial infarction are shown below.

|

|
| Bull's eye and three
dimensional reconstructions of a ventricle in
systole (top), showing an area of dyskinesia
(blue) in the apex, and diastole (bottom),
showing a larger area of post systolic
shortening (yellow). |
Bulls eye from
systole and early diastole (top, left) , below
3D reconstruction (bottom, left) in systole and
M-modes from all six walls (right), showing an
inferior infarct with slight dyskinesia and
more extensive akinesia in systole and post systolic
shortening in the infarcted wall.
|
In the systolic images, the areas of
dyskinesia are especially evident, but as in the stress
example above, areas around may be hypokinetic (not as
evident in the parametric images), but in the diastolic
images the PSS is seen to be fairly extensive, proving
that this is not purely recoil.
According to the description
above, if all segments are
pathological, the PSS should be less obvious or even absent
due to the lack of interaction with normal segments as
demonstrated below.
 |
Severe
ischemia in all walls in a patient with severe
three vessel disease (among other things
stenosis left main, occluded LAD filled from
RDP, even with occluded RCA filled from
collaterals) . Visually, the most striking
finding is fall in EF with increasing stress.
|
 |
Strain
rate colour M-mode. No significant PSS
can be seen (Except possibly apicolaterally).
Thus at first glance, the M-mode looks normal,
at least concerning synchrony.
|
 |
 |
| Strain
rate curves (left) and strain (right) of
the ventricle at peak stress. Again, no
significant PSS can be seen (Except possibly
apicolaterally), demonstrating clearly that
there are little PSS when there are no
segments with normal contraction-relaxation
cycles. The AVC is evident from the phono
traces. The strain curves show delayed and
prolonged shortening, but more or less in all
segments. This is equivalent to the balanced
ischemia of scintigraphy. |
It must be emphasized that the presence of PSS is mainly a
measure of inhomogeneity of force development, due to
differences in activation, load or contractility, and not as
specific marker of ischemia.In pathological myocardium this
has also been demonstrated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
where the prolonged contraction persists into diastole, even
causing ejection from the hypertrophied apex (
87).
|

|
| Recording
from a patient with apical hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. During systole there
is virtual obliteration of the apical
cavity. Ejection can be seen in blue, and
there is a delayed, separate ejection from the
apex due to delayed relaxation. There is an
ordinary mitral inflow (red), but no filling of
the apex in the early phase (E-wave), while the
late phase (A-wave) can be seen to fill the
apex. Left, a combined image in HPRF
and colour M-mode. The PRF is
adjusted to place two samples at the mitral
annulus and in the mid ventricle just at the
outlet of the apex. The mitral filling is
shown by the green arrows, and the late
filling of the apex is marked by the blue
arrow. In addition, there is a dynamic mid
ventricular gradient shown by the red arrow,
with aliasing in the ejection signal in colour
Doppler. The delayed ejection from the apex is
marked by the yellow arrow (the case is
described in (87). |
 |
| Strain rate from the
same patient, showing PSS in the apical part of
the septum, and nearly the whole of the lateral
wall. (images were made in a very early
software, but yellow is still shortening, blue
lengthening.) |
Also in
hypertension is PSS a frequent finding (
187).
Asynchrony:
Conduction delay:
Conduction delays may lead to asynchronous contraction of
the left ventricle.

|
Dilated
cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block. It
is evident early contraction of the septum with
short duration, due to the lack of load
provided by the rest off the ventricle and
then there is delayed contraction of the lateral
wall.
|
This is evident in
the M-mode, where there is an early, short lasting dip
of the septum, about 300 ms earlier than the peak of
the inferolateral wall. The phenomenon has been
described as "septal beaking" and is a sign of left
bundle branch block (251).

|

|
Looking at
velocities, there seems to be an earlier peak
velocity in the septum than the lateral wall,
this may indicate asynchrony.
|

|

|
Looking
at the deformation parameters, there is septal
shortening (initial negative spike in the yellow
curve) of brief duration, and then lateral
shortening (larger negative spike in the cyan
curve) of much longer duration. In this case the
mechanics is much more evident by strain than by
strain rate when looking at the traces, showing
a brief shortening of the septun, and then
prolonged stetch (yellow curve), and delayed and
prolonged shortening in the lateral wall (cyan).
|
However, looking
at the strain rate colour M-mode the same is evident,
even despite the heavy reverberations in the lateral
wall.
This finding was described first in 1974 (251), described that the
septal activation vcame already after about 40 ms,
corresponding to the electromechanical delay. This is
during the pre ejection period, where
there normally is no shortening.However, due to the
absence of activation in the rest of the ventricle, the
seotum will be free to shorten without pressure increase,
thus giving an early and rapid contraction in what would
normally be the IVC. The rest of the ventricle contracts
delayed, when the contraction of the septum is finished,
and the work is done without assistance from the septum.
In this case, the asynchrony is evident from velocities,
but the mechanism is more evident looking at deformation.
Post systolic shortening
Presence of PSS may give asynchrony between walls, where
almost all of the wall may be out of phase, even if there
are gradients of ischemia as shown below.
 |
| Stress
echocardiography with development of
ischemia in the inferolateral wall. At
peak stress, the whole of the wall can be
seen to move paradoxically, moving inwards
(and towards the apex) after end of septal
contraction. Again, in a clinical
situation, the interpretation can be
facilitated by stopping and scrolling. |
 |
 |
| The velocity
(motion) confirms the visual impression,
the whole inferolateral wall moves
downwards in systole, and upwards after
end systole (Yellow and green curves),
while the septum shows normal apically
directed velocities giving a total
asynchrony between the two walls. This
asynchrony is also evident by the curved
M-mode, starting a the inferior base,
going through the apex and ending at the
septal base.This might be due to both
apical and basal ischemia. |
 |

|
The strain curves
below, separates the effects of the
segments, showing systolic dyskinesia
(lengthening) with some net post
systolic shortening in addition to the
recoil in the base (yellow curve), and
systolic hypokinesia in the apical segment
(green curve) with post systolic shortening,
compared to a fairly normal strain curve in
the septum. Thus, deformation imaging
showing most severe ischemic reaction in the
basal part, giving highest probability of a
Cx ischemia, which was confirmed
angiographically.
|
In this case, the tissue velocities are sufficient to
detect the presence of ischemia, but the deformation
imaging shows the location and extent of the ischemia,
while velocities shows
asynchrony
of the whole inferolateral wall. Thus, the basolateral
ischemia might have been mis interpreted for lateral
asynchronia.
The presence of regional systolic dysfunction
in combination with post systolic shortening, may cause
asynchronous motion of a whole wall, as shown above. This
means that the presence of asynchrony in motion imaging is
not specific. A further example, also from stress echo;
i.e. ischemia, is shown below.
Velocity images
showing motion towards the apex in red, away
from apex in blue. Left, systolic 3D
reconstructed image, showing normal motion in the
septum and inferior wall, and paradoxical motion in
the inferolateral, lateral and anterior wall. Right,
om top are bull's eye from systole, showing the same,
as well as early diastole showing inverse motion
during the e-phase, i. e motion of the whole wall
towards the apex in diastole. Apparently, the whole
anterolateral half of the ventricle is ischemic .
Strain rate images
from the same recording, left systole, right early
diastole, showing that the ischemia is due to a
smaller ischemic area in the inferolateral, lateral
and anterior apex, where there is streching during
systole (blue). This stretching, results in the
midwall and basal segments moving away from the apex,
despite contracting normally. In early diastole there
is recoil in the ischemic area (yellow), resulting in
anterior diastolic motion in the whole of the
wall. In this case, the ischemia is obviously
limited to a part of the apex, the rest of the motion
abnormalities being due to tethering.
In both these cases, it is evident that asynchrony between
walls, as seeen by motion imaging is not real asynchrony,
but an effect of
tethering
to a smaller asynchronous (ischemic) area. Thus, simply
showing asynchrony by motion imaging is insufficient in the
diagnosis of conduction abnomalitiy induced asynchrony.
Also,
|

In this peak stress image, the tissue Doppler
confirms the presence of initial asynchrony:
The whole of the inferolateral wall seem to
show dyskinesia (Yellow and cyan curve), with
early motion (after IVC) away from apex. It
seems to be most pronounced in the apical
part.The septal base moves normally, toward
apex (red curve). By placing the sample volume
in the aortic ostium, the high velocities of
the aortic closure is identified, giving the
timing of end systole. This timing can then be
transferred to the deformation images below. |
| Stress echo. In
this case, the image is suspect of a delayed
inward motion of the base of the wall at start
systole at medium and peak dose. |
|

|

|
| Strain
rate (left) and strain (right) showing that
there is a slight reversal of shortening in the
early diastole, but only in the base (cyan)
. The delay, however, is shown to be
entirely within systole. The clinical meaning of
this is uncertain, but it was not due to
ischemia, as the coronary angiography was
completely ("super"-) normal. |
In this case, the deformation imaging helps in the timing
confirms the delay,but shows it to be less pronounced, and
not indicative of ischemia, and it also helps in showing the
the extent, compared to tissue velocity. (The patient had
completely normal coronaruy angiography).
Translation effects
However, translation effects with motion of the whole
ventricle, may also result in apparent asynchrony as shownin
the exemple
above (main images
repeated below for repetition):
 |

|
The whole heart can
be seen to be rocking. This might indicate
asynchrony, or dyskinesia of the septum.
|
However, looking at
the short axis view, the wall thickening
(transmural strain) can be seen to be
synchronous.
|

|

|
Tissue
Doppler left shows delayed onset and peak
velocity of motion of the lateral wall, but
this is due to the rocking motion of the whole
heart. Strain rate shows symmetric timing of
onset and peak shortening. This
difference between motion and deformation
imaging was evident already in B-mode, when
knowing what to look for.
|
In this case, the motion (velocity imaging) is mis
informing, giving the appearance of dyssynchronous function
of the left ventricle, while deformation shows this to be
untrue.
Diastolic
events
Isovolumic relaxation period (IVR)
The isovolumic relaxation period is defined at the time from
aortic valve closure to mitral valve opening, i.e. the
period when there is no ejection or inflow to the ventricle.
Thus, there can be no overall volume change. It is easy to
show in Doppler flow tracings, if the tracings include both
aortic valve click and start of mitral flow:
Isovolumic
relaxation period (IVR), is the period from aortic
valve closure (AVC) to mitral valve opening (MVO). In
a Doppler flow recording with the sample volume
between the aortiv and mitral valves, this is easily
seen by the valve click of AVR
to the start of mitral inflow.
The opening of the valves is a passive event, where the
valves follow the blood flow, with the same motion and
velocity. Thus the valve opening is the start of flow
through the valve. As with AVC, due to heart rate
variability, it would be advantageous if the mitral valve
opening (MVO) could be identified in the tissue Doppler
recordings, instead of being transferred from other cycles.
This problem actually is trivial, but for pedagogical
reasons it may be wothwhile to look closer into the
mechanics of mitral annulus and leaflet motion.
When is mitral valve opening?
The trivial part of the problem is that the start of
anterior mitral motion can be identified by placing a sample
volume at the tip of the mitral valve, and identifying the
point of earliest anterior moment:
Mitral valve
opening. The point of initial high velocities in a
sample volume placed close to the tip of the mitral
leaflets at end systole will identify this.
As the mitral valve is visible in all standard planes, this
is feasible for all tissue Doppler measurements. It should
be possible to identify the mitral valve opening directly.
The real opening point is the point where the mitral leaflet
moves toward the apex, but independently of the apical
motion ot the mitral ring. However, as the parts of base of
the heart moves slightly towards the apex after AVC, the
mitral valve motion follows the mitral ring and may have
apical motion as well, and the leaflet may have partly
motion from the ring, and partly from the tip:

|

|
 |

|
Motion of the mitral
ring, mitral leaflet and mitral tip.
Bottom; zoomed to the time period of interest.
The septal mitral ring (yellow curve) can be
seen to "bounce" after AVC, meaning that it has
apical motion during IVR. This motion is
of course imparted also to the mitral leaflet,
and means that the start of apical motion do not
mark the MVO.
|
Velocity traces of the
same points as seen to the left. The start of
apical motion of the mitral ring (yellow curve)
corresponds to a shft from negative to positive
velocities after the protodiastolic negative
velocity spike (i.e. the crossing of the zero
line.
|
A sample volume at the
middle of the mitral leaflet (green curve), will
have the same motion as the ring, although with
some delay. However, we see that apical motion
starts around the middle of IVR, before MVO.
|
This corresponds to
positive velocities in the last half of IVR
(green curve).
|
The sample volume at
the mitral tip (red curve) shows no apical
motion during IVR, rater motion in the opposite
direction, but an abrupt start of apical motion
at the end of AVR, at the same time as the
mitral ring shifts to motion toward the base.
Thus, this is an independent leafet motion, and
marks the MVO, and it can be seen that during
IVR, there is ballooning away from the apex of
the mitral leaflets.
Both mitral valve traces can be seen to
deflect sharply downwards at a later time point
(white markers) , this is due to aliasing of the
tissue velocity when the velocities reaches the
Nykvist limit.
|
The mitral tip (red
curve) can be seen to have negative velocities
(moving away from the apex) during IVR, and to
cross from negative to positive velocities at the
same time as the mitral ring crosses from positive
to negative.
The points of aliasing can be seen at the abrupt
downward stroke in the traces from the mitral
leaflets (White markers), which is earlier at the
tip than in the middle of the leaflet. Only in the
mitral ring can AVC be seen with certainty. |
The aliasing velocities of the mitral
vale are later than MVO, as this marks the time when the leaflet
movement (moving with the same velocity as the flow, as
discussed
here)
reaches the aliasing velocity of the tissue Doppler, being
dependent on the PRF and depth. This is also earliest at the
mitral leaflet tips, as they have the most rapid motion, but
still later than MVO.

|

|

|
M-modes
from the mitral ring (left), middle mitral
leaflet (in terms of distance from ring to tip -
middle image) and mitral tip (right image),
corresponding to the traces above. The
traces show only systole and early diastole, as
above. As in the traces there is shift from
negative (blue) to positive (red) at AVC and
from positive to negative at the event taken to
be closest to MVO. In the middle mitral
leaflet, however, this is less well defined,
only in the lowest part can these event being
identified. At the mitral tips, the transition
marking AVC is absent, (as above), while the
second transition from blue to red is visible in
a short part of the M-mode.
|
Thus when the mitral valve opens, flow starts and the
ventricle expands (elongates) corresponding to the downward
shift in displacement of the mitral ring. However, the
mitral valve opens, meaning motion of the leaflets into the
ventricle,
continuing
the motion towards the apex. Thus the leaflets do
not have the shift from positive to negative
velocities. Some authors have described this
anyway, but this is due to the fact that the
lateral resolution in
tissue Doppler is very low due to the low line density, in
order to achieve a high frame rate, meaning that an M-mode
line placed across the mitral leaflet close to the ring
actually will be ring velocities as discussed in the
measurements
section. In addition, the base of the mitral leaflets
will tend to follow the ring motion more than the tips.
Also, the opening of the mitral valve is gradual, starting
at the tips, and moving outwards towards the ring.
Looking at mitral ring traces, the logical candidate would
be the moment the mitral ring starts to move away from the
apex, after the "bounce" following the AVC. This would
hypothetically be the time point where the ventricle starts
the volume increase, seen as elongation by the mitral ring.
But as this is not an abrupt mechanical event, but rater a
gradual transition (an upwards convex curve in the
displacement traces), this is not as easily delineated. Also
, it is not necessarily present in all parts of the mitral
ring (theoretically, it shouldn't, of course!).

|

|
| Looking
at
the mitral ring, which would reflect the overall
volume changes, there is concomitant negative
velocities (basal motion during the
protodiastolic event in both parts of the mitral
ring. But after AVC, we se negative velocities
continuing in the lateral part, while there is a
positive motion (bounce) in the septal part.
This is consistent with no volume change, but a
tilting of the left ventricle during the IVR. Mitral opening thus
possibly corresponding to the start of basal
motion as seen by the septal curve. Only after MVO do
the septal part start basal motion concomitant
with the lateral part. And only then will there
be overall elongation (volume increase). This do
correspond to s shioft in the septal velocity
curve from posisitve to negative. It is the second zero
crossing after the protodiastolic dip. |
Thus, it will correspond to a shift from positive to
negative velocity in the velocity traces from the septum
(but not from the lateral wall), and a red to blue shift in
the colour traces, as seen below.
However, as seen
from the M-mode, the transition from positive to
negative (red to blue) is not evident at all levels.
Fundamentally, however, the
identification of MVO in an apical tissue Doppler
recording is truly trivial, using the mitral
leaflet itself (which can be seen in all apical views), as
long as care is taken to place the sample volume at the tip
of the leaflet.
What about strain rate and
strain curves?
As shown
above
and discussed in detail
below, the strain
rate curves show a very complex pattern, and is unsuited for
locating events in this part of the heart cycle. Also the
strain curves shows different patterns in different levels
of the myocardium. Thus, the deflection points can be seen
to be located differently in the different levels of the
wall. In addition, the presence of post systolic shortening,
especially in pathology, but also in normal ventricles, will
result in the shortening will last longer in the
strain rate then the upward movement in the
displacement.
Mitral valve
opening should thus be identified in velocity images and
transferred to deformation images from the same loop.

|

|
Zoomed
images of velocity (left) and displacement
(right), showing that there is a peak apical
mitral ring displacement at the event
taken to correspond to MVO. This is equivalent
with the second
zero crossing of the velocity trace after
protodiastolic dip.
|
 |
Peak
negative strain occurs later in base and
midwall. AVC can be seen best by strain curves
in the midwall segment. No definite deflection
can be seen to correspond to the event assumed
to be MVO transferred from the
Velocity/displacement traces.
|
During the IVR, there is a rapid pressure drop. The pressure
curve is sigmoid, with a transition from convex curve during
last part of ejection, to a concave curve at the start of
mitral inflow. The time constant of the pressure drop , the
tau, is taken as a measure of diastolic function, meaning
relaxation velocity. AS the maximal relaxation is during the
IVR, this would be the logical time for measurement of
diastolic function, but as
there is no overall volume change or flow, and little
deformation, this may be les than optimal from an imaging
point of view.
The peak negative dP/dt, is the transistion point. This
transition should be no earlier than AVC. It has been seen
to be close to the AVC (
244),
and has been suggested as a marker of aortic valve closure
in pressure tracings.This however, was the case in open
chest experiments, which may differ in the closed chest
physiology.
Deformation during
IVR
As discussed
above, there is an
elongation and volume expansion at end ejection, due to
continued relaxation after the flow has stopped, but this
occurs before aortic valve closure, and is thus
protodiastolic. It may
be the mechanism for aortic valve closure itself.
During the true IVR, from AVC to mitral valve opening (MVO),
there can be no overall volume change. However,
intraventricular flow in normal subjects during the IVR has
been described early (246).

|

|

|
Colour M-mode in
normal subject. The mitral valve is included,
and to the left the colur is removed from the
same two cycles in the same recording, to locate
the point of mitral valve opening better.
|
IVRT:
Zooming in on the images, at end ejection can se
the valve click as a vertical bar (Just as in
pulsed Doppler recordings as seen above) thus, the
IVR is very easily defined, and apically
directed flow (red) above the mitral valve, i.e.
intraventricular can be seen during the IVR.
|
The apically directed intraventricular flow during IVR, must
mean that the apex has to deform during this phaset. The
flow has to be taken as an indication of a base-to-apex
pressure gradient, and hence, that relaxation starts in the
apex. As described
above, true
relaxation starts earlier, during ejection, but the gradient
is an indication that
early deformation starts in the apex.
There has to be a space for the blood volume to flow into.
Thus, the earliest deformation starts during isovolumic
relaxatin in the apex. This has been confirmed by MR (247)
Thus, there has to be
regional deformation during IVR, but no
overall change in volume. This would mean that there should
be expansion in the apex, but without overall volume
increase, this shoud correspond to a decrease in volume in
the base.

|

|
 |

|

|
Strain
rate tracings in this subject show positive
strain rate (lengthening) during IVR in the
septal apical and lateral apical and midwall
segments, concomitant with negative strain rate
(shortening) in the basal segments. (In the
apical area, there are near field
reverberations, which have to be excluded.
These, however are evident by the abrupt shift
in direction between high strain rates. )
|
Further examples of this isovolumic deformation in the apex
can be seen
here,
here,
here,
here and
here, and the net result would be
a shape change without net increase in volume, as indicated
by the annular tracings: