........serbisk separatisme sjølsagt. Serbisk separatisme i Bosnia og.....i
Kosovo!!
"preventing the support of Serbian separatists in Bosnia and Kosovo with
the help of NATO"
Dette er et av mange forslag som no blir presentert som straffetiltak
dersom "demokratane" i Jugoslavia ikkje "demokratiserer" godt nok og raskt
nok. Krava er mange og lista blir lagt stadig høgare slik at ein er sikker
på at dei aldri kjem seg over. 31. mars er den magiske fristen.
Dei andre foreslåtte tiltaka er dei vanlige død over Jugoslavia-tiltaka:
"demokratisering" (finansiering av alle mulige quislingar og nyttige
idiotar), fortsatt utmattingskrig mot folket ved hjelp av fortsatt terror
og fattigdomsutvikling, og framfor alt: radikal desentralisering, dvs
partering denne gangen med endelig punktum for Jugoslavia og fortsatt
krymping av Serbia.
Utpressing, storstilt korrupsjon og krigstruslar.
Klippt frå "FreeSerbia", (tidlegare?) undergravingsarbeidarar, 8.mars.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeserb/e-index.html
Asgeir Bjørkedal.
New sanctions suggestion
Daniel Server, the president of the Balkan Initiative of
American Peace Institute in Washington, confirmed for the
daily “Blic” that he is the author of the document
entitled
“Serbia after Milosevic: progress report”. This
document was
delivered to the State Department and contains suggested
actions, which the United States could take unless
Belgrade
authorities do not meet the requests made by the United
States. The deadline for these requests to be met is
March
31.
The report estimates that the process of establishing
legal
rights rule in Yugoslavia is a slow one, so that a
large part of
Milosevic’s apparatus was able to incorporate itself
into the
legal institutions of the new government. It is also
stated
that the Amnesty Law did not include a couple of
hundred of
ethnic Albanians suspected of terrorism and are still
imprisoned. No improvement in Belgrade’s relations with
Bosnia cannot be seen, even if the guarantee for
sovereign
Bosnia exists, the report states and adds that the FRY
president still supports extreme nationalists in
Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Kosovo.
The question is raised whether there are problems because
of which it is difficult for the FRY to fulfil the
requests set by
the United States. The answer to this question is
“yes”. Many
Serbs are preoccupied with their poor financial
state. Besides
that, the FRY faces an armed rebellion in southern
parts of
Serbia, which has preoccupied the government work and
aimed the political spectrum in a nationalist direction.
Nevertheless, Belgrade has a chance to make moves in the
next twenty days, which would present the FRY as a
country
on the right path. But in case that does not happen,
there
are certain measures suggested that would be taken.
The measures are: redirection of the help aimed for
Yugoslavia only to non-government organizations and
municipalities who, in large number, support the United
States’ policies; requesting the European Union support;
opposing the acceptance of the FRY into the World Bank;
preventing the support of Serbian separatists in
Bosnia and
Kosovo with the help of NATO; making it clear that NATO
support concerning the termination of the rebellion in
southern Serbia only depends on Belgrade accepting the
requests set by the United States; ending the
resistance to
Montenegrin independence; redirecting of support from the
FRY to Serbian Government, which greatly intercedes
for the
acceptance of the requests set by the United States.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 14:22:07 MET