Den virkelige Big Brother reiser sitt store, stygge hode mens folk flest
titter på TV-skjermenes vrangbilde av åpenhet.
Mvh,
Per
---------- Forwarded message ----------
The Guardian
Thursday February 22, 2001
Special report: human rights in the UK
Wearing a T-shirt makes you a terrorist
Anything with a slogan could put you outside the law now
By George Monbiot
Britain, Tony Blair announced at Labour's spring conference on
Sunday, is on the brink of "the biggest progressive political advance
for a century". To prepare for this brave new world, two days before
his speech Mr Blair bombed Baghdad. On Monday, the progressive era
was officially launched, with the implementation of an inclusive
piece of legislation called the Terrorism Act 2000.
Terror, in the new progressive age, is no longer the preserve of the
aristocracy of violence. Today almost anyone can participate, just
as long as she or he wants to change the world.
Beating people up, even killing them, is not terrorism, unless it is
"designed to influence the government" or conducted "for the purpose
of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause". But since
Monday you can become a terrorist without having to harm a living
being, provided you believe in something.
In that case, causing "serious damage to property" or interfering
with "an electronic system" will do. Or simply promoting or
encouraging such acts, or associating with the people who perform
them, or failing to tell the police what they are planning. Or, for
that matter, wearing a T-shirt or a badge which might "arouse
reasonable suspicion" that you sympathise with their activities.
In his speech on Sunday, Tony Blair called for a "revolution" in our
schools, and spoke of "noble causes...asking us to hear their cry for
help and answer by action". So perhaps we should not be surprised to
learn that you can can now become a terrorist by supporting
government policy.
British subjects writing pamphlets or giving lectures demanding a
revolution in Iraq can be prosecuted under the new act for
"incitement" of armed struggles overseas. The same clause leaves the
government free to bomb Baghdad, however, as "nothing in this section
imposes criminal liability on any person acting on behalf of, or
holding office under, the crown."
By such means, our new century of progressive politics will be
distinguished from those which have gone before. There will be no
place, for example, for violent conspiracies like the Commons
Preservation Society. The CPS launched its campaign of terror in
1865, by hiring a trainload of labourers to dismantle the railings
around Berkhamstead Common, thus seriously damaging the property of
the noble lord who had just enclosed it.
The CPS later split into two splinter groups called the Open Spaces
Society and the National Trust. Under the new legislation, these
subversive factions would have been banned.
Nor will the state tolerate dangerous malefactors such as the woman
who claimed "there is something that governments care far more for
than human life, and that is the security of property, and so it is
through property that we shall strike the enemy" and "the argument of
the broken windowpane is the most valuable argument in modern
politics". Emmeline Pankhurst and her followers, under the act,
could have been jailed for life for damaging property to advance a
political or ideological cause.
Indeed, had the government's new progressive powers been in force,
these cells could have been stamped out before anyone had been
poisoned by their politics. The act permits police to cordon off an
area in which direct action is likely to take place, and arrest
anyone refusing to leave it.
Anyone believed to be plotting an action can be stopped and searched,
and the protest materials she or he is carrying confiscated. Or, if
they prefer, the police can seize people who may be about to commit
an offence and hold them incommunicado for up to seven days.
Under the new act, the women who caused serious damage to a Hawk jet
bound for East Timor could have been intercepted and imprisoned as
terrorists long before they interfered with what Mr Blair described
on Sunday as his mission to civilise the world. So could the
desperados seeking to defend organic farmers by decontaminating
fields of genetically modified maize.
Campaigners subjecting a corporation to a fax blockade become
terrorists by dint of interfering with an electronic system. Indeed,
by writing articles in support of such actions, I could be deemed to
be "promoting and encouraging" them. Which makes me a terrorist and
you, if you were foolish enough to copy my articles and send them to
your friends, party to my crime.
I don't believe the government will start making use of these new
measures right away: after all, as Mr Blair lamented on Sunday,
"Jerusalem is not built overnight". But they can now be deployed
whenever progress demands. Then, unmolested by dangerous lunatics
armed with banners and custard pies, the government will be free to
advance world peace by bombing Baghdad to its heart's content.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 13:55:25 MET