Why the Left is So in Favor of a United Europe

From: Knut Rognes (knrognes@online.no)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:43:36 MET

  • Next message: Trond Andresen: "Teknisk test"

    KK-Forum,

    fra antiwar.com i dag
    http://antiwar.com/rep/laughland7.html

    "... Nationalism was not only seen by the New Left as common and vulgar it
    also represented an obstacle to their vision of a managerially run society.
    The nation, after all, is the indispensable framework for democracy, and
    free citizens have a nasty habit of voting for the wrong people. When the
    Left began to understand that the EU could be used as an instrument for
    doing away with nations and establishing the reign of powerful and
    unaccountable planners, they realised Brussels was no longer the enemy but
    a potential vehicle for their deepest internationalist longings. ..."

    Knut Rognes

    ***************************
    Why the Left is So in Favor of a United Europe
    by John Laughland

    Sunday Mail 1/21/01

    When German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer gets up to give his
    after-dinner speech at Claridges in Mayfair on Wednesday, he will probably
    breathe a sigh of relief that his life is getting back to normal.
                   
    After all, it is not every week that a Foreign Minister and Vice-Chancellor
    is called as a witness in the trial of a terrorist accused of murder.

    Fischer was in court in Frankfurt last week to testify on behalf of his old
    friend Hans-Joachim Klein. Klein, who was arrested after living under an
    assumed name for 20 years, is on trial for his part in a Red Army Faction
    attack on an OPEC meeting in Vienna in 1975, during which three people were
    murdered.

    As students in Frankfurt in the Seventies, Klein and Fischer wearing
    motorcycle helmets and carrying batons took part in the fighting during
    various protests. Fischer led a gang called PUTZ the Proletarian Union for
    Terror and Destruction.

    Photographs from 1973 show Fischer beating a policeman to the ground with a
    baseball bat and then stamping on him. One policeman, who was nearly killed
    in 1976 when a petrol bomb blew up his car, accuses Fischer of attempted
    murder.

    Nowadays Fischer is considered by the Euro-cognoscenti as 'one of Europe's
    most original thinkers', a man committed to a federal Europe. This is why
    he has been invited by former British Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd to
    address the German-British Forum on Wednesday.
                   
    But what is remarkable is that Fischer is not alone in being a Seventies
    Leftwing radical who has transformed himself into a passionate
    pro-European. On the contrary, many of those who were so virulent and in
    some cases violent in their opposition to the old EEC are now among those
    who most earnestly seek a united Europe. Why should this be?

    The answer lies in the Leftwing beliefs these people have never truly
    given up: the desire to wield power and dictate people's lives with no
    democratic restraint. Suddenly, they have discovered the society they once
    sought to create by revolution can easily be achieved through the EU.

    The leading pro-European in the British Government is a former Communist.
    Peter Mandelson joined the Young Communist League in the Seventies and took
    part in Soviet-organised events such as a visit to Cuba. These days he
    tries to play down his Communist militancy, but it was serious enough for
    MI5 to open a file on him.

    The other leading pro-Europeans in the British Government are Tony Blair
    and Robin Cook. Both belonged to the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. This
    meant Blair supported 'the unilateral abandonment by Britain of nuclear
    weapons and nuclear bases'. These men did not belong to the cuddly old
    Labour Party which believed in social justice and workers' rights.

    Instead, they came from the extreme edge of the Leftwing movement which
    campaigned for the free West to disarm in front of the dictatorial East.
    The activities of CND were an integral part of the peace movement which
    was, in reality, controlled by Moscow.

    All today's great pro-Europeans made their choices when it mattered during
    the Cold War and they opted not to defend the democratic West.

    When you look at other European nations, a similar picture emerges. In
    Germany, both Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Interior Minister Otto
    Schily were lawyers for members of the Baader-Meinhof gang, which carried
    out bombings for its East German paymasters. Schroeder even wrote letters
    to East Germany's Communist dictators in 1986 to wish them luck in
    forthcoming 'elections'.

    Meanwhile, in the European Parliament, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the leader of
    the May 1968 student rebellion in Paris, is a leading advocate of European
    integration (and an old friend of Joschka Fischer). All these men are now
    ardent pro-Europeans.

    In France and Italy, the picture is similar. The Italian Communists, also
    enthusiastic supporters of a federal Europe, were brought to power by none
    other than Romano Prodi, current President of the European Commission. He
    was the architect of the compromisebetween the Social Democrats and
    Communists which won them power in 1996 and continues to control the
    government. In France where the pro-European government includes
    Communists, Prime Minister Lionel Jospin is accused of being a former
    Trotskyite.

    In Britain and elsewhere, many of these extreme Left-wingers were convinced
    until the mid-Eighties that the European Community was a capitalist bloc.
    As such they opposed it, as did the Soviet Union.

    Blair's personal election pamphlet in 1983 vowed that Labour 'will
    negotiate a withdrawal from the EEC which has drained our natural resources
    and destroyed jobs'. Cook said in 1974 that 'the Tories have handed control
    of Britain over to Brussels'. In 1984 he said Britain should withdraw from
    the EEC. Those people who now say we should abandon our national currency
    and give up control of our economy were saying 15 years ago that we should
    leave Europe altogether.

    As if by command, this all changed in the mid-Eighties. Mikhail Gorbachev
    came to power in Moscow in 1986 and ended the Soviet Union's hostility to
    the European Union. Jacques Delors was appointed President of the European
    Commission and turned Brussels from a forum for arguing over milk quotas
    into an exciting New Left project to lead Europe to a post-national future.

    The peace movement was run by Moscow. Serious old Lefties looked to the EU
    as a substitute for the Soviet Union. The EU offered plenty for admirers of
    Communism. Whereas there had been commissars, now there were commissioners;
    where power had once been vested in 'soviets', or councils, now there was
    the European Council; where there had been a Central Committee, now there
    was the European Commission. In the EU, the Left realised, there was the
    chance for planners and administrators like themselves to run the lives of
    ordinary people.

    The EU began to dedicate itself to the task of eradicating nationhood.
    Internationalism was always the Left's core value. Nationalism was not only
    seen by the New Left as common and vulgar it also represented an obstacle
    to their vision of a managerially run society. The nation, after all, is
    the indispensable framework for democracy, and free citizens have a nasty
    habit of voting for the wrong people. When the Left began to understand
    that the EU could be used as an instrument for doing away with nations and
    establishing the reign of powerful and unaccountable planners, they
    realised Brussels was no longer the enemy but a potential vehicle for their
    deepest internationalist longings.

    The Right in Britain is insufferably complacent. It believes Thatcherite
    reforms in the Eighties continue to set the agenda. What no one on the
    Right seems to have grasped is that the Left was reconciled to the free
    market long ago, especially to global capitalism, which it regards as a
    revolutionary force. While the Right rests on its laurels, the Left
    continues with its traditional programme of dismantling democracy and
    establishing elitist control over all our lives.

    Its commitment to dissolving European nations into one centrally controlled
    structure is only part of an old, and frankly Communist, dream.
    **************************'''



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:44:50 MET